Decisions of the Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

DATE: 20041022
DOCKET: C41717

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

RE:

RICHARD CARLSTROM (Appellant (Plaintiff)) – and – PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS ONTARIO, MICHAEL F. PHILIP, BERNARD MOYLE (Respondents (Defendants)) – and – HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO, (MINISTRY OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY) (Respondents (Defendants))

   

BEFORE:

MOLDAVER, SHARPE JJ.A. and KILEEN J. (ad hoc)

   

COUNSEL:

Richard Charlstrom

 

In person

   
 

Renee A. Kopp

 

for the respondent Professional Engineers Ontario et al.

   
 

Bradley Phillips

 

for the respondent Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario

 

and Michael F. Philip and Bernard Moyle

   

HEARD &

October 20, 2004

ENDORSED:

 
   

On appeal from the judgment of Justice Donald Cameron of the Superior Court of Justice dated February 20, 2004.

APPEAL  BOOK  ENDORSMENT

[1]               For the reasons given by the motion judge, we agree that the appellant’s claim against the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario (APEO) was properly struck out.  Accordingly, the appeal as against APEO is dismissed with costs fixed at $3,500 inclusive of GST and disbursements.

[2]               As for the appellant’s claim against Messrs. Philip & Moyle and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario (the Crown defendants), we are not satisfied that as pleaded, the claim makes out a cause of action that could potentially take it outside the reach of s. 7(1) of the Public Authorities Protection Act. Accordingly, we are satisfied that that aspect of the appellant’s claim was properly struck out as well.

[3]               The appeal against the Crown defendants is therefore dismissed with costs fixed at $3,500 inclusive of GST and disbursements.

                                    “M. J. Moldaver J.A.”

                                    “Robert Sharpe J.A.”

                                    “Gordon Killeen J. (ad hoc)”

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.