Decisions of the Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. v. West Face Capital Inc., 2023 ONCA 533

DATE: 20230808

DOCKET: C70208, C70209 & C70228

Miller, Coroza and Copeland JJ.A.

DOCKET: C70208

BETWEEN

The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. and Callidus Capital
Corporation

Plaintiffs

and

West Face Capital Inc., Gregory Boland, M5V Advisors Inc., c.o.b. Anson Group Canada, Admiralty Advisors LLC, Frigate Ventures LP, Anson Investments LP, Anson Capital LP, Anson Investments Master Fund LP, AIMF GP, Anson Catalyst Master Fund LP, ACF GP, Moez Kassam, Adam Spears, Sunny Puri, ClaritySpring Inc., Nathan Anderson, Bruce Langstaff, Rob Copeland, Kevin Baumann, Jeffrey McFarlane, Darryl Levitt, Richard Molyneux, Gerald Duhamel, George Wesley Voorheis, Bruce Livesey and John Does #4-10

Defendants

AND BETWEEN

West Face Capital Inc. and Gregory Boland

Plaintiffs by Counterclaim

(Respondents)

and

The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. and Callidus Capital Corporation, Newton Glassman, Gabriel De Alba, James Riley, Virginia Jamieson, Emmanuel Rosen, B.C. Strategy Ltd. d/b/a Black Cube, B.C. Strategy UK LTD. d/b/a Black Cube, and PSY Group Inc.

Defendants by Counterclaim

(Appellants)

 

DOCKET: C70209

AND BETWEEN

The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. and Callidus Capital

Corporation

Plaintiffs

(Appellants)

and

Dow Jones and Company, Rob Copeland, Jacquie McNish and Jeffrey McFarlane

Defendants

(Respondents)

 

DOCKET: C70228

AND BETWEEN

The Catalyst Capital Group Inc. and Callidus Capital

Corporation

Plaintiffs

(Appellants)

and

West Face Capital Inc., Gregory Boland, M5V Advisors Inc., c.o.b. Anson Group Canada, Admiralty Advisors LLC, Frigate Ventures LP, Anson Investments LP, Anson Capital LP, Anson Investments Master Fund LP, AIMF GP, Anson Catalyst Master Fund LP, ACF GP, Moez Kassam, Adam Spears, Sunny Puri, ClaritySpring Inc., Nathan Anderson, Bruce Langstaff, Rob Copeland, Kevin Baumann, Jeffrey McFarlane, Darryl Levitt, Richard Molyneux, Gerald Duhamel, George Wesley Voorheis, Bruce Livesey and John Does #4-10

Defendants

(Respondents)

John E. Callaghan, Richard G. Dearden, Benjamin Na, Matthew Karabus, and Marco S. Romeo, for the appellants (C70208, C70209 and C70228), Catalyst Capital Group Inc. and Callidus Capital Corporation

David Moore and Ken Jones, for the appellants (C70208, C70209 and C70228), Catalyst Capital Group Inc., Callidus Capital Corporation, Newton Glassman, Gabriel De Alba, and James Riley

Matthew Milne-Smith, Andrew Carlson, and Maura O’Sullivan, for the respondents (C70208 and C70228), West Face Capital Inc. and Gregory Boland

M. Philip Tunley, for the respondents, Dow Jones and Company and Jacquie McNish (C70209) and Rob Copeland (C70209 and C70228)

Lucas Lung and Rebecca Shoom, for respondents (C70228), ClaritySpring Inc. and Nathan Anderson

Eugene Bodnar and Breanne Campbell, for the respondent (C70228), Kevin Baumann

Mark Wiffen, for the respondents, Jeffrey McFarlane (C70209 and C70228) and Darryl Levitt (C70228)

A. Dimitri Lascaris, Paul Guy, and Ashley Seely, for the respondent (C70228), Bruce Livesey

Heard: October 18-19, 2022

On appeal from the orders of Justice Thomas J. McEwen of the Superior Court of Justice, dated December 2, 2021.

COSTS ENDORSEMENT

[1]          On release of this court’s reasons in which the appellants’ appeals and cross-appeal were dismissed, we invited written submissions on costs of the appeals.

[2]          We were advised that the appellants had reached an agreement with the respondent Bruce Livesey to pay his costs in respect of the appeal of the dismissal of the Wolfpack action in the amount of $65,000, all inclusive. Costs are accordingly ordered payable to Mr. Livesey on that basis.

[3]          With respect to the remaining respondents, the appellants propose an aggregate payment of $300,000 as partial indemnity costs to be divided among the remaining respondents as they see fit.

[4]          The respondents West Face Capital Inc. and Gregory Boland (together, “West Face”) seek costs of the appeals on a full indemnity basis in the amount of $455,476.60, all inclusive. West Face’s costs calculated on a partial indemnity basis are $273,488.97.

[5]          The respondent Kevin Baumann seeks costs on a partial indemnity basis in the amount of $30,077.03, all inclusive.

[6]          The respondents Darryl Levitt and Jeffrey McFarlane seek costs on a partial indemnity basis in the amount of $44,380.75, all inclusive.

[7]          The respondents ClaritySpring Inc. and Nathan Anderson seek costs on a partial indemnity basis in the amount of $45,143.95, all inclusive.

[8]          The respondents Dow Jones and Company, Rob Copeland, and Jacquie McNish (the “Dow Jones defendants”) seek partial indemnity costs in the amount of $90,992.03, all inclusive.

[9]          As this court noted in 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Association, 2018 ONCA 853, at para. 1, the presumptions in s. 137.1(7) and (8) of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C. 43, do not apply to appeals. Costs of the appeals are therefore to be determined by the conduct of the appeals. The appeals were comprehensive, wide-ranging and hard fought. Because of the scope of the appeals and the amounts at stake, the appellants accept that the costs award will be considerable. But there was nothing in the appellants’ conduct of the appeals that would warrant an order of costs on an elevated basis.

[10]      With respect to quantum, then, the appellants do not take issue directly with the bills of costs submitted by the respondents. The claim that the costs sought is excessive is based solely on costs awards in other appeals that the appellants argue are comparable. There are of course limits to the utility of such comparisons.

[11]      We are persuaded to the contrary that the amounts sought by the various respondents are reasonable and proportionate. There was evident cooperation among counsel, with little or no duplication of effort. West Face took the lead in the Wolfpack action and had the most at stake. It is appropriate that the costs it seeks would be significantly higher than the other respondents. Similarly, the costs of the Dow Jones defendants were significantly higher than those of the other parties to the defamation action, as they carried a greater burden in that litigation.

DISPOSITION

[12]      Accordingly, the respondents are awarded their costs of the appeals in the following amounts on a partial indemnity basis, all inclusive:

1.  The West Face parties - $273,488.97;

2.  Bruce Livesey - $65,000;

3.  Kevin Baumann - $30,077.03;

4.  Darryl Levitt and Jeffrey McFarlane - $44,380.75;

5.  ClaritySpring Inc. and Nathan Anderson - $45,143.95;

6.  The Dow Jones defendants - $90,992.03.

“B.W. Miller J.A.”

“S. Coroza J.A.”

“J. Copeland J.A.”

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.