Decisions of the Court of Appeal

Decision Information

Decision Content

COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO

CITATION: R. v. Porter, 2019 ONCA 114

DATE: 20190214

DOCKET: C65884

MacPherson, Sharpe and Tulloch JJ.A.

BETWEEN

Her Majesty the Queen

Respondent

and

Roy Porter

Appellant

 

Scott Hutchison and Roy Porter, for the appellant

Luke Schwalm, for the respondent

Heard: February 12, 2019

On appeal from the conviction entered on April 20, 2018 and the sentence imposed on August 28, 2018 by Justice P.H. Marjoh Agro of the Ontario Court of Justice.

APPEAL BOOK ENDORSEMENT

[1]          We see no merit in the conviction appeal. The information was amended during the trial and there is nothing before us to support the submission that the amendment was improper.

[2]          We agree that the trial judge appears to have treated the appellant’ lack of remorse as an aggravating factor. However, we are not persuaded that we should interfere with the resulting sentence of one year imprisonment. As held in R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, it is open to an appellate court to uphold a fit sentence despite an error of this nature. The appellant abused a position of trust and took advantage of his very vulnerable cousin. The fraud was planned and carried out over a lengthy period. A sentence of one year is entirely appropriate. See R. v. Mathur, 2017 ONCA 403.

[3]          In our view, the trial judge did err by only giving the appellant six months to pay the fine in lieu of forfeiture. We alter that term of the sentence to give him two years.

[4]          Finally, it is conceded by the Crown that the victim fine surcharge must be set aside.

[5]          Sentence appeal allowed but only to the extent ordered above. Conviction appeal dismissed.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.